Archived
austinandClaude Opus 5
9e80590687
The ported markup was written a page at a time, so the same thing was said several ways. Counted before touching anything: nine variants of the page gutter, seven max-widths, six link styles, two definitions of an input, and one stray shadow. Now: `container` (which already centres and pads), `measure`/`measure-wide`, `link`/`link-plain`/ `link-on-dark`, one `field`, `photo`, `page-head`. Nothing in a template writes `bg-white rounded-… shadow-…` or `underline underline-offset-4` any more — 119 uses of `panel`, 82 of `label`, 52 of `panel-lift`, 17 of `link`. TWO REAL FIXES FELL OUT OF IT, not just tidying: - Every section said `container mx-auto px-4`: `mx-auto` twice, and a px-4 that beat the responsive padding inside `container`. The gutter was 16px at every width, including on a 27-inch screen. Removing the copy-paste restores sm:px-6 lg:px-8, which is most of why the pages now breathe. - The public form and the admin had grown two different inputs — cream vs white, ring-2 vs ring-1, py-2.5 vs py-2, and different text sizes. There is one `field` now, and the same focus ring as everything else. The admin uses the same names where they are the same thing (`link`, `field`, `h4`, `--radius-*`) and keeps its own denser buttons, because it is a tool and not a shop front. 53 tests green. Every class used across all nine pages resolves in the compiled stylesheet — that check is what makes a sweep this size safe to do with a script. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <[email protected]>